Auth0 vs Firebase Auth for Solo Developers
Comparing Auth0 and Firebase Auth for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Auth0 | Firebase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Enterprise identity platform | Google-backed auth service |
| Pricing | Free (7,500 MAU) / $35/mo Essential | Free (50,000 MAU) / Pay-as-you-go |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Easy |
| Best For | Apps needing enterprise SSO and compliance | Mobile and web apps in the Google ecosystem |
| Solo Dev Rating | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Auth0 Overview
Auth0 is the enterprise identity platform from Okta. It covers every authentication scenario you'll encounter: social logins, passwordless, MFA, SAML SSO, machine-to-machine tokens, and granular role-based access. The Universal Login page handles auth on their domain, keeping credentials away from your servers.
The configuration depth is both Auth0's strength and its learning curve. You'll configure applications, connections, rules, and actions. The Actions system lets you run serverless code during auth flows. Documentation is thorough and covers every framework.
I reached for Auth0 when a B2B project needed Okta SSO for an enterprise client. It handled the SAML integration without me writing custom token verification. For that specific need, nothing else compared.
Firebase Auth Overview
Firebase Auth is Google's authentication service, part of the broader Firebase platform. It supports email/password, phone auth, anonymous auth, and social providers (Google, Apple, Facebook, GitHub, Twitter). The SDK handles the entire flow: token generation, refresh, session persistence, and user management.
What makes Firebase Auth compelling for solo developers is the free tier. 50,000 monthly active users cost nothing. Phone auth has its own pricing (verification SMS costs), but email and social logins are free at serious scale. The Firebase console gives you a user management interface and basic analytics.
I use Firebase Auth in a mobile project where the entire backend is Firebase. The integration between Auth, Firestore security rules, and Cloud Functions is seamless. Users authenticate, and Firestore rules reference request.auth.uid to control data access. Zero custom middleware needed.
Key Differences
Free tier. Firebase Auth gives you 50,000 MAU for free. Auth0 gives you 7,500. That's nearly 7x the headroom. For a solo developer's side project or early-stage startup, Firebase's free tier means you won't pay for auth until you have a real business. Auth0's free tier runs out much faster.
Setup speed. Firebase Auth takes about 20 minutes to set up. Install the SDK, initialize the app, call signInWithPopup() or createUserWithEmailAndPassword(), and you're authenticating users. Auth0 requires configuring an application in the dashboard, setting up callback URLs, installing the SDK, and wiring up the authentication flow. It's more steps and more configuration.
Platform integration. Firebase Auth integrates tightly with Firestore, Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage, and other Firebase services. Security rules reference the authenticated user directly. Auth0 is standalone. It handles identity but doesn't integrate with your database or backend services at the infrastructure level. You wire that up yourself.
Enterprise features. Auth0 has SAML SSO, SCIM provisioning, organizations, and compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA). Firebase Auth has none of this. If your customers are enterprises that need SSO, Auth0 is the answer. Firebase Auth is built for consumer and small business use cases.
Customization. Auth0's Actions let you run code during auth events. Firebase has Cloud Functions triggers for auth events (user creation, deletion). Both are flexible, but Auth0 gives you more control over the actual auth flow. Firebase is more rigid about how authentication works but simpler because of it.
Vendor lock-in. Firebase Auth ties you to Google's ecosystem. Migrating away means exporting users (possible but manual) and rebuilding auth. Auth0 ties you to Okta's ecosystem. Neither is easy to migrate from, but Auth0 stores less of your application data, so the blast radius of migration is smaller.
When to Choose Auth0
- You need enterprise SSO (SAML, SCIM) for B2B customers
- Security compliance certifications matter for your use case
- You want auth independent from your database and backend platform
- You need advanced auth flows like machine-to-machine tokens
- Your framework isn't well-supported by Firebase SDKs
When to Choose Firebase Auth
- You're already using Firebase for your database and backend
- The 50,000 MAU free tier matters for your budget
- You're building a mobile app (Firebase's mobile SDKs are excellent)
- You want the simplest possible auth setup for a consumer app
- You need anonymous auth for gradual user onboarding
The Verdict
For solo developers building consumer-facing apps, especially mobile apps, Firebase Auth is the better choice. The 50,000 MAU free tier, simple SDK, and deep Firebase platform integration make it the practical pick. You'll have auth working in 20 minutes and won't pay for it until you have tens of thousands of users.
Auth0 is the right choice when enterprise requirements enter the picture. SAML SSO, compliance certifications, and organizational structures are Auth0's territory. If you're building B2B software where customers ask about SSO during the sales process, Auth0 handles that. Firebase Auth doesn't.
My recommendation: use Firebase Auth if you're building for consumers or if you're already in the Firebase ecosystem. Use Auth0 if you're building for enterprise buyers. Most solo developers are building consumer products, so Firebase Auth will be the right call more often.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.