FastAPI vs Laravel for Solo Developers
Comparing FastAPI and Laravel for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | FastAPI | Laravel |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Modern Python async web framework | Full-featured PHP MVC framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Easy-Moderate | Moderate |
| Best For | Python APIs with auto documentation | Full-featured web apps with batteries included |
| Solo Dev Rating | 9/10 | 8/10 |
FastAPI Overview
FastAPI is the Python web framework that took the community by storm. Built on Starlette and Pydantic, it combines Python's type hints with automatic validation, serialization, and documentation generation. Define a Pydantic model, use it as a type hint in your route, and FastAPI generates Swagger docs, validates requests, and returns typed responses automatically.
The async support is native and smooth. Write async def for your route handlers and you get non-blocking I/O that performs comparably to Node.js for web workloads. This puts FastAPI in a rare position: Python's ecosystem depth with performance that doesn't embarrass you.
For solo developers, FastAPI's killer feature is productivity through automation. The auto-generated docs at /docs give you an interactive API explorer without writing a single line of documentation. Type hints serve triple duty as documentation, validation, and IDE intelligence. You write code once and get three benefits.
Laravel Overview
Laravel is the most comprehensive web framework available in any language. Authentication, ORM (Eloquent), migrations, queues, task scheduling, mail, caching, file storage, broadcasting, and a template engine all ship in the box. Artisan CLI scaffolds controllers, models, and migrations with a single command.
The framework's ecosystem extends even further. Forge provisions servers. Vapor deploys to AWS Lambda. Nova provides admin panels. Cashier handles subscriptions. Socialite manages OAuth. Each package integrates seamlessly because the same team builds them for the same framework.
For solo developers building traditional web applications with forms, dashboards, and admin panels, Laravel eliminates an enormous amount of decision-making and integration work. You don't choose between five ORMs or three template engines. Laravel provides one good solution for each concern.
Key Differences
API vs full-stack. FastAPI is designed for building APIs. It excels at JSON request/response cycles, automatic documentation, and async data processing. Laravel is designed for full-stack web applications. It handles server-rendered views, form processing, file uploads, and API development. If you need server-rendered HTML, Laravel handles it natively. FastAPI requires integrating a separate template engine.
Automatic documentation. FastAPI generates Swagger UI and ReDoc documentation from your code. Change a route parameter, and the docs update automatically. Laravel requires manual setup with packages like L5-Swagger. For API-first products, FastAPI's automatic documentation is a massive time saver.
Validation approach. FastAPI uses Python type hints and Pydantic for validation. Your IDE shows you exactly what fields exist and what types they are. Laravel uses validation rules defined as arrays or classes. Both work well, but FastAPI's approach catches type errors at the IDE level before you even run your code.
Built-in features. Laravel ships with significantly more built-in functionality. Queue management, task scheduling, mail, caching, file storage, and broadcasting are all included. FastAPI focuses on the API layer and relies on separate packages for everything else. If you need background jobs, scheduled tasks, and email, Laravel saves you the integration effort.
Performance. FastAPI with uvicorn handles async workloads impressively for a Python framework. Laravel on PHP is adequate for most workloads but doesn't match FastAPI's throughput for API-heavy applications. For projects that are primarily APIs serving JSON, FastAPI is faster.
Language ecosystems. Python gives you access to NumPy, Pandas, scikit-learn, TensorFlow, and the entire data science/ML ecosystem. PHP gives you WordPress, established CMS platforms, and decades of web development libraries. Your choice depends on what ecosystem serves your project best.
When to Choose FastAPI
- You're building an API-first product
- Automatic API documentation is important to your workflow
- You want Python ecosystem access (data science, ML, automation)
- Performance matters and you need async capability
- You prefer type-hint-based validation over manual rule definitions
When to Choose Laravel
- You're building a full-stack web application with views and forms
- You need built-in authentication, queues, scheduling, and mail
- You want the most complete framework ecosystem with official packages
- You prefer convention-over-configuration with strong CLI scaffolding
- You need admin panels, dashboards, or server-rendered interfaces
The Verdict
Both frameworks are excellent for solo developers, and the choice comes down to project type. FastAPI wins for API-first development where automatic documentation, type safety, and Python ecosystem access matter. Laravel wins for full-stack web applications where you need everything from authentication to email built into one cohesive system.
FastAPI gets 9/10 because its automation features save solo developers enormous amounts of time on API projects. The auto-docs, type-based validation, and clean async support make it the most productive API framework available. Laravel gets 8/10 because its batteries-included approach is the best option for solo developers building traditional web applications.
Pick FastAPI if your product is an API. Pick Laravel if your product is a web application. Both are strong choices that will serve you well.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.