Hono vs AdonisJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Hono and AdonisJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Hono | AdonisJS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Multi-runtime lightweight framework | Full-stack MVC Node.js framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Easy | Moderate |
| Best For | Lightweight APIs, edge computing | Full-stack applications with built-in ORM and auth |
| Solo Dev Rating | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Hono Overview
Hono is a minimalist JavaScript framework that runs everywhere. Cloudflare Workers, Bun, Deno, Node.js, AWS Lambda. The core is about 14KB, but it comes packed with middleware for authentication, validation, CORS, caching, and rate limiting. It uses Web Standard APIs, making your code portable across runtimes without modification.
I appreciate Hono's focus. It does HTTP routing, middleware, and request handling exceptionally well. It doesn't try to be an ORM, a template engine, or a mail sender. You pick the tools you need, plug them in, and build exactly the API you want. For projects where the backend is a pure API serving a frontend, this focused approach avoids unnecessary overhead.
The edge deployment story is Hono's superpower. Deploy to Cloudflare Workers and your API runs in 300+ global locations with sub-millisecond cold starts. You get global low latency without managing servers, without configuring load balancers, without paying for multiple VPS instances. For a solo developer, that's infrastructure you don't have to think about.
AdonisJS Overview
AdonisJS is the framework for Node.js developers who want everything included. It ships with Lucid ORM, a complete auth system, email sending, file storage, validation, and a template engine. If you've used Laravel, AdonisJS mirrors that experience in TypeScript.
Lucid ORM is the centerpiece. Active Record pattern, migrations, seeds, factories, model relationships, and soft deletes are all built in. When your application is data-heavy with complex relationships between models, Lucid handles the database layer without you reaching for external packages.
AdonisJS v6 is fully TypeScript-native. The validation system uses vine schemas that are both expressive and type-safe. The auth system covers sessions, API tokens, access tokens, and social authentication. The framework even includes built-in support for health checks, graceful shutdowns, and environment variable validation. It's clearly designed by people who ship production applications.
Key Differences
Scope. This is the core trade-off. Hono is a focused HTTP framework. AdonisJS is a full-stack application framework. Hono gives you a fast API layer and lets you assemble the rest. AdonisJS gives you everything from database to email in one cohesive package. Your project scope determines which approach saves more time.
Database handling. AdonisJS includes Lucid ORM with migrations, seeds, and query builder. Hono includes nothing for databases. With Hono, you'll pick Prisma, Drizzle, or raw SQL. AdonisJS's integrated approach means your ORM is designed to work with the framework's validation, serialization, and auth systems seamlessly.
Authentication. AdonisJS has a complete auth system built in. Sessions, API tokens, social login, guards, and middleware. With Hono, you use the JWT middleware for token auth and build the rest yourself or use third-party packages. If your app needs user authentication (most apps do), AdonisJS saves significant implementation time.
Deployment model. Hono deploys to edge, serverless, and traditional servers. AdonisJS deploys to traditional Node.js servers. If you want Cloudflare Workers or AWS Lambda deployment, Hono supports it natively. AdonisJS is designed for long-running Node.js processes.
Performance. Hono is significantly lighter and faster for pure API workloads. AdonisJS trades some performance for its full-stack features. For most applications, AdonisJS's performance is more than adequate, but Hono wins on raw throughput and startup time.
Development speed for complete features. If you need a feature that involves a database model, API endpoint, validation, auth check, and email notification, AdonisJS implements that faster because all those pieces are integrated. With Hono, you assemble each piece individually.
When to Choose Hono
- Your backend is a pure API consumed by a separate frontend
- You want edge deployment on Cloudflare Workers
- You prefer assembling your own stack from best-in-class tools
- Performance and minimal footprint are priorities
- You need multi-runtime portability
When to Choose AdonisJS
- You're building a full-stack application with user accounts, data models, and emails
- You want ORM, auth, validation, and email integrated out of the box
- You come from a Laravel or Rails background
- You prefer a cohesive framework over assembling packages
- You value conventions and structure to keep your codebase maintainable
The Verdict
Both deserve their 8/10 rating because they excel at different things. This is not a "one is better" situation. It's a "which fits your project" decision.
Choose Hono if you're building an API-first product where the backend serves data and the frontend is a separate application. The lightweight footprint, edge deployment capability, and multi-runtime support make it perfect for modern API architectures.
Choose AdonisJS if you're building a complete application that needs database management, user auth, email, and server-side logic all working together. The batteries-included approach means you spend your time on product features instead of wiring together packages.
The simplest heuristic: if your backend needs a database ORM and user authentication, start with AdonisJS. If your backend is mostly routing, data transformation, and API calls, start with Hono.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.