Laravel vs AdonisJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Laravel and AdonisJS for solo developers - features, pricing, DX, and which to pick.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Laravel | AdonisJS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Batteries-included PHP framework | Batteries-included TypeScript framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Moderate |
| Best For | Full-stack web apps with the largest ecosystem | Full-stack web apps in TypeScript with Laravel-like DX |
| Solo Dev Rating | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Laravel Overview
Laravel is the gold standard for batteries-included web development. Eloquent ORM, Blade templating, built-in auth (Breeze/Jetstream), queue management (Horizon), task scheduling, mail, notifications, and first-party admin panel options (Filament, Nova). The ecosystem is massive and mature.
What makes Laravel stand out for solo developers is the depth of the ecosystem. Need Stripe billing? Cashier. Need real-time events? Broadcasting with Reverb. Need a debugging tool? Telescope. Need deployment? Forge. These aren't community packages that might be abandoned. They're maintained by the Laravel team and designed to work together seamlessly.
I've built production apps with Laravel and the speed to a working product is consistently impressive. You focus on your business logic and Laravel handles the plumbing. For a solo developer, that's the ideal division of labor.
AdonisJS Overview
AdonisJS is the framework that openly says "we want to be Laravel for TypeScript." And honestly, they've done a solid job. Lucid ORM (similar to Eloquent), built-in auth with guards, schema-based validation, mailers, a CLI that generates boilerplate, and convention-over-configuration architecture. If you know Laravel, AdonisJS will feel immediately familiar.
Version 6 was rewritten entirely in TypeScript, and the type inference throughout the framework is excellent. Models, controllers, validators, middleware, everything is properly typed. You get the Laravel-style productivity with TypeScript's compile-time safety.
I was genuinely surprised by how complete AdonisJS feels. Most Node.js frameworks make you assemble everything yourself. AdonisJS gives you a cohesive, opinionated setup where the pieces work together because they were designed as a unit.
Key Differences
Ecosystem size is Laravel's biggest advantage. Laravel has been around since 2011 with millions of users. The package ecosystem is enormous. Whatever problem you have, someone has built a Laravel package for it. AdonisJS is growing but significantly smaller. You'll find fewer third-party packages and fewer Stack Overflow answers.
Language choice is the deciding factor for many. Laravel is PHP. AdonisJS is TypeScript. If you're a JavaScript/TypeScript developer who wants Laravel-style productivity without learning PHP, AdonisJS is exactly what you're looking for. If you're language-agnostic, Laravel's ecosystem gives it an edge.
Admin panel story. Laravel has Filament, which is genuinely one of the best admin panel builders in any framework. AdonisJS has no equivalent. There's no one-command admin interface generator. For solo developers who need to manage data, this gap matters more than it might seem.
ORM comparison. Eloquent and Lucid are architecturally similar (both Active Record pattern). Eloquent is more mature with more features (polymorphic relationships, soft deletes, model events, observers). Lucid covers the common cases well but lacks some of Eloquent's advanced features.
Authentication. Both have built-in auth with guards and middleware. Laravel's auth ecosystem is deeper with Sanctum (API tokens), Passport (OAuth2), and Socialite (social login). AdonisJS covers the fundamentals with session and token-based auth.
Deployment. Laravel has Forge for managed deployment. AdonisJS deploys like any Node.js application, on a VPS, in a Docker container, or on a platform like Railway. Neither is particularly difficult, but Forge reduces deployment to a few clicks.
Community and support. Laravel has one of the largest and most active communities of any framework. Laracasts alone has thousands of video tutorials. AdonisJS has a passionate community but it's orders of magnitude smaller.
When to Choose Laravel
- Ecosystem size and package availability matter
- You need an admin panel without building one from scratch
- You want the most deployment options (Forge, Vapor for serverless)
- You need advanced ORM features (polymorphic relations, model events)
- Community support and learning resources are important to you
When to Choose AdonisJS
- You're a TypeScript developer and don't want to learn PHP
- You want Laravel-style conventions with compile-time type safety
- Your team/project is already invested in the Node.js ecosystem
- You value a cohesive, opinionated framework over assembling Express middleware
- You need a backend framework that integrates naturally with frontend JavaScript tooling
The Verdict
This is the closest comparison in this batch because AdonisJS is essentially "Laravel in TypeScript." The philosophies are nearly identical. The conventions are similar. The developer experience is comparable. The difference comes down to ecosystem size and language preference.
Laravel wins on ecosystem. More packages, more tutorials, more Stack Overflow answers, better admin panel tooling, more deployment options. That ecosystem advantage is real and it translates directly into faster problem-solving.
AdonisJS wins on language. If you're a TypeScript developer, writing the entire stack in TypeScript means shared types, shared tooling, shared knowledge. No PHP to learn, no context switching between languages.
For solo developers, I'd give the slight edge to Laravel because the ecosystem saves time. But if you're firmly in the TypeScript camp, AdonisJS is the best batteries-included option in the entire Node.js ecosystem. It's not a compromise. It's a genuine alternative that does Laravel's approach well in a different language.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.