Laravel vs Elysia for Solo Developers
Comparing Laravel and Elysia for solo developers - features, pricing, DX, and which to pick.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Laravel | Elysia |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Batteries-included PHP framework | Bun-first TypeScript web framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Easy |
| Best For | Full-stack web apps with admin panels and complex logic | Type-safe, high-performance APIs on Bun |
| Solo Dev Rating | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Laravel Overview
Laravel does everything. Authentication, ORM, migrations, queues, scheduling, mail, caching, admin panels (via Filament or Nova), rate limiting, API resources, broadcasting. You start a project and the toolbox is full before you write any business logic.
I've spent enough time with Laravel to know that its biggest advantage for solo developers is removing decisions. You don't pick an ORM. You use Eloquent. You don't debate auth libraries. You use Breeze or Jetstream. You don't build an admin panel. You install Filament. Each decision not made is cognitive energy saved for the things that actually matter, like building your product.
The Laravel ecosystem extends beyond the framework too. Forge handles deployment. Horizon manages queues. Telescope provides debugging. Cashier handles Stripe billing. These are all first-party packages maintained by the same team, which means they work together reliably.
Elysia Overview
Elysia is the Bun-native framework that does something genuinely clever with TypeScript. You define your request schema using Elysia's type system, and you get both runtime validation AND compile-time type inference from a single declaration. No separate Zod schemas and TypeScript interfaces. One definition, two guarantees.
The first time I used Elysia's type system, I understood why people are excited about it. You declare body: t.Object({ name: t.String() }) and TypeScript automatically knows the shape inside your handler. No type assertions, no manual casting, no "trust me, it's this type." The types flow through your entire application naturally.
Performance-wise, Elysia on Bun is fast. Really fast. Benchmarks consistently show it outperforming Express and Fastify, sometimes by significant margins. For API workloads, the throughput is impressive.
Key Differences
Scope is the fundamental difference. Laravel is a complete web application framework. Elysia is an API framework. Laravel covers database, auth, background jobs, mail, scheduling, and admin UI. Elysia covers HTTP routing, request validation, and middleware. For a full application, you'd need to add a lot of pieces around Elysia to match what Laravel provides.
Type safety approach. Elysia's end-to-end type inference is its standout feature. Laravel has type hints in PHP 8.x, but PHP's type system is weaker than TypeScript's. For developers who value catching errors at compile time, Elysia has a genuine advantage.
Admin panel. Laravel with Filament gives you a full admin interface generated from your models. Elysia has nothing comparable. If you need to manage data, moderate content, or debug user accounts, you're either building that interface yourself or managing data through raw SQL. For solo developers, this is a significant gap.
Runtime maturity. Laravel runs on PHP, which has been in production for 30 years. Elysia runs on Bun, which is much newer. Bun is production-ready for most use cases, but the PHP ecosystem has deeper battle-testing for edge cases and scaling scenarios.
Performance vs. productivity. Elysia handles more requests per second. Laravel gets features built faster. For most solo developer projects, the bottleneck is development time, not server throughput. But if you're building a high-traffic API, Elysia's performance advantage is real.
Community and ecosystem. Laravel has one of the largest framework communities in any language. Elysia's community is growing but significantly smaller. More community means more tutorials, more packages, more Stack Overflow answers.
When to Choose Laravel
- You need a full web application with auth, admin panel, and background jobs
- Time to a working product is your top priority
- You want first-party packages for everything (billing, queues, deployment)
- You prefer convention over configuration
- Community support and ecosystem breadth matter
When to Choose Elysia
- You're building a pure API and type safety is a priority
- Performance matters for your specific use case
- You want Bun as your runtime for speed
- The backend is relatively focused (20-30 endpoints, no admin panel needed)
- You're already comfortable in the TypeScript ecosystem
The Verdict
This comparison really comes down to what you're building. Laravel is the better choice for web applications where you need the full stack: user management, admin panels, background processing, email notifications. Elysia is the better choice for API-focused backends where type safety and performance are top priorities.
For solo developers specifically, I'd lean toward Laravel for most projects. The amount of pre-built functionality saves days or weeks of development time. You're not just getting a framework. You're getting an entire ecosystem that works together.
But if you're building a backend API that will be consumed by a separate frontend and you value TypeScript's type system, Elysia is worth serious consideration. The developer experience is excellent, the performance is outstanding, and the type inference eliminates a whole class of bugs. Just be prepared to build supporting infrastructure (admin tools, background jobs, email sending) yourself.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.