Laravel vs NestJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Laravel and NestJS for solo developers - features, pricing, DX, and which to pick.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Laravel | NestJS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Batteries-included PHP framework | Opinionated Node.js/TypeScript framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Steep |
| Best For | Rapid full-stack web development | Structured, enterprise-grade Node.js backends |
| Solo Dev Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Laravel Overview
Laravel is the framework that makes PHP genuinely productive. Eloquent ORM, built-in auth scaffolding, migrations, queues, scheduling, mail, notifications, and an entire admin panel ecosystem (Filament, Nova). You start a Laravel project and you can have user registration, email verification, and a working admin dashboard within an hour.
I used to dismiss PHP entirely. Then I actually spent time with Laravel and realized I was being an idiot. The DX is excellent. Artisan commands generate controllers, models, and migrations. The documentation is some of the best in any framework. And the ecosystem, Forge for deployment, Livewire for reactivity, Inertia for SPAs, fills every gap you'd normally piece together yourself.
For solo developers, Laravel's biggest strength is speed to production. You're not choosing between 5 ORM libraries. You're not wiring up authentication from scratch. You're building your actual product.
NestJS Overview
NestJS brings Angular-style architecture to Node.js backends. Decorators, modules, dependency injection, guards, interceptors, pipes. It's the most structured framework in the Node.js ecosystem, and that structure is simultaneously its biggest strength and its biggest barrier.
The modular architecture is legitimately well-designed. Controllers handle HTTP, services handle business logic, modules group related functionality. When a project grows to 100+ files, having clear organizational patterns prevents the chaos that Express apps often become.
But the boilerplate cost is real. Creating a simple CRUD feature requires a controller, service, module, DTOs, and entity class. That's a lot of files and a lot of ceremony for "save this data and give it back." I've found myself spending more time satisfying NestJS's patterns than actually solving problems.
Key Differences
Speed to productive output. Laravel gets you to a working application faster. Run laravel new, install Breeze for auth, and you're building features. NestJS requires more upfront setup, more boilerplate per feature, and more decisions about supporting libraries.
Admin panel story. Laravel has Filament and Nova, which generate full admin interfaces from your models. NestJS has no equivalent. If you need to manage data without building custom UI, this alone might decide the choice. For solo developers, an admin panel is not optional. It's how you debug, manage users, and stay sane.
Database tooling. Eloquent is tightly integrated with Laravel. Migrations, seeders, factories, query scopes. Everything works together. NestJS uses TypeORM, Prisma, or MikroORM. All solid options, but none integrate as seamlessly with the framework as Eloquent does with Laravel.
Language preference matters. If you're a JavaScript/TypeScript developer who doesn't want to learn PHP, NestJS is the natural choice. If you're language-agnostic and care most about productivity, Laravel tends to win. PHP has quirks, but modern PHP (8.x) is actually a clean language.
Testing. Both have good testing stories. Laravel's built-in testing with PHPUnit and HTTP assertions is straightforward. NestJS's dependency injection makes mocking easy. Neither has a significant advantage here.
Deployment. Laravel deploys easily with Forge or a simple VPS with PHP-FPM. NestJS deploys as a Node.js process on any hosting that supports it. Laravel has a slight edge with Forge handling SSL, databases, and deployments automatically.
When to Choose Laravel
- You need an admin panel without building one from scratch
- Speed to launch is your top priority
- You want a batteries-included framework with minimal assembly required
- You're open to learning PHP (modern PHP is actually nice)
- Your app needs auth, queues, scheduling, and mail out of the box
When to Choose NestJS
- You're a TypeScript developer who wants to stay in the JavaScript ecosystem
- Your project needs complex architecture that will scale to a large codebase
- You need WebSockets or GraphQL with strong framework-level support
- You want dependency injection for testability
- You're building microservices that need clear module boundaries
The Verdict
For solo developers, Laravel wins this comparison. It's not close. The amount of functionality you get out of the box, the admin panel ecosystem, the deployment simplicity with Forge, and the speed to a working product are hard to match in any ecosystem.
NestJS is a good framework, but it's built for teams. The decorator-heavy architecture and boilerplate requirements make more sense when 5 engineers need clear boundaries. When you're one person, that ceremony slows you down.
If you're strictly a TypeScript developer and learning PHP is off the table, NestJS is fine. But if you're choosing purely on productivity for solo work, Laravel deserves its reputation as one of the best options available. Build in Laravel, spend your evenings doing something other than writing DTOs.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.