/ tool-comparisons / MongoDB vs Prisma for Solo Developers
tool-comparisons 5 min read

MongoDB vs Prisma for Solo Developers

Comparing MongoDB and Prisma for solo developers. Features, pricing, and which to pick.

Quick Comparison

Feature MongoDB Prisma
Type Document-oriented NoSQL database TypeScript ORM with auto-generated types
Pricing Free tier (Atlas) / $57+/mo dedicated Free / Open Source
Learning Curve Easy Easy-Moderate
Best For Apps with document-based data and flexible schemas TypeScript full-stack apps where DX matters
Solo Dev Rating 7/10 8/10

MongoDB Overview

MongoDB is a document database that stores data as JSON-like documents. No predefined schema required. You insert a document, and MongoDB stores it. The flexibility is real, and for JavaScript developers, working with documents feels natural because they are essentially JavaScript objects.

MongoDB Atlas provides managed hosting with a free tier (512 MB). The ecosystem includes Mongoose for schema validation and middleware, Compass for visual data browsing, and official drivers for every major language. The community is large, documentation is thorough, and finding answers to problems is easy.

For solo developers, MongoDB works well for prototyping and applications where data structures genuinely vary. Content management systems, product catalogs with different attributes, and event logging all benefit from the document model.

Prisma Overview

Prisma is a TypeScript ORM, not a database. This distinction matters. Prisma sits between your application code and your database, providing type-safe queries, auto-generated client code, visual data browsing (Prisma Studio), and migration management.

Here is the key: Prisma supports MongoDB as a data source. So you can actually use both together. You can also use Prisma with PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and CockroachDB. Prisma is database-agnostic. It gives you a unified, type-safe interface regardless of what database sits underneath.

The developer experience is where Prisma shines. Define your data model in a .prisma schema file, run prisma generate, and get a fully typed client. Every query returns typed results with auto-complete in your editor. Rename a field in your schema, and TypeScript immediately shows you every place that needs updating.

Key Differences

These solve different problems. MongoDB is a database that stores your data. Prisma is a tool that makes working with databases easier. Comparing them directly is like comparing a car engine to a steering wheel. They operate at different layers of your stack. The real question is: should you use MongoDB directly, MongoDB with Prisma, or Prisma with a different database?

Type safety transforms solo development. When you are the only developer, there is no code reviewer catching your mistakes. Prisma's type-safe client catches data access bugs at compile time. With raw MongoDB queries, a typo in a field name silently returns empty results instead of throwing an error. Prisma with MongoDB gives you type safety on top of MongoDB's document model.

Prisma with MongoDB has limitations. Prisma's MongoDB support is more limited than its SQL support. Some features like raw SQL (obviously), certain filter operations, and database-level constraints are unavailable. The Prisma MongoDB connector works, but it is not as polished as the PostgreSQL or MySQL connectors. If you want the full Prisma experience, pair it with PostgreSQL.

Schema enforcement. MongoDB is schema-free by default. Mongoose adds optional schema validation. Prisma enforces a schema by design, with your .prisma file defining the shape of every model. For solo developers, Prisma's enforced schema prevents the data inconsistencies that accumulate in schema-free MongoDB collections over time.

Migration workflows. MongoDB does not have traditional migrations because there is no schema to migrate. Prisma has prisma migrate for SQL databases, but for MongoDB it uses prisma db push which syncs your schema without creating migration files. This is simpler but less auditable than proper migrations.

Querying approach. MongoDB's native query API uses methods like find(), aggregate(), and operators like $match and $group. Prisma wraps everything in a TypeScript-native API: prisma.user.findMany({ where: { active: true }, include: { posts: true } }). Prisma's API is cleaner and more intuitive for TypeScript developers. MongoDB's native API gives you more control for complex aggregations.

When to Choose MongoDB (directly)

  • You are not using TypeScript
  • You need MongoDB's full aggregation pipeline capabilities
  • You prefer working with the native MongoDB driver
  • You are using a language where Prisma is not available (Python, Go, Java)
  • Performance-critical operations need direct database access

When to Choose Prisma

  • You are building with TypeScript and want type-safe database access
  • Auto-generated types and auto-complete improve your productivity
  • You want Prisma Studio for visual data browsing and editing
  • You want the flexibility to switch between databases later
  • Schema enforcement prevents data inconsistencies

The Verdict

If you are a TypeScript developer, use Prisma. The 8/10 rating reflects real productivity gains from type safety, auto-complete, and schema enforcement. The question is what database to put under Prisma. My recommendation: use Prisma with PostgreSQL (via Neon or Supabase) for the best experience. Prisma's PostgreSQL support is more mature and feature-complete than its MongoDB support.

If you are not using TypeScript, or if you need MongoDB's full aggregation pipeline capabilities, use MongoDB directly with its native drivers or Mongoose. The 7/10 for MongoDB reflects its strength as a standalone database. But for the TypeScript ecosystem, Prisma on top of PostgreSQL gives you more capability than MongoDB alone.