Next.js API Routes vs AdonisJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Next.js API Routes and AdonisJS for solo developers - features, pricing, DX, and which to pick.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Next.js API Routes | AdonisJS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Serverless API layer in a React framework | Batteries-included Node.js/TypeScript framework |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source | Free / Open Source |
| Learning Curve | Easy | Moderate |
| Best For | Simple backend logic in a Next.js app | Full-featured backend applications in TypeScript |
| Solo Dev Rating | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Next.js API Routes Overview
Next.js API Routes are the path of least resistance when you're already building with Next.js. File-based routing, serverless deployment, one codebase for frontend and backend. For solo developers who want to avoid managing a separate backend service, it's the obvious starting point.
I've built several small projects using only API Routes for the backend. Contact forms, auth flows, simple data APIs. For these cases, the convenience is real. You're not switching contexts between two codebases, two deployment pipelines, or two sets of environment variables.
The constraint is also real. API Routes have no structure. No ORM, no migration system, no validation layer, no auth framework. Each endpoint is a standalone function. When your backend grows beyond a handful of endpoints, you're essentially building your own framework from scratch. And homebrew frameworks are never as good as real ones.
AdonisJS Overview
AdonisJS is the Node.js framework that reminds me of Laravel. And I mean that as a strong compliment. It comes with an ORM (Lucid), migrations, authentication (with session and token-based options), validation, mailers, a template engine, and a CLI that generates boilerplate. It's what Rails or Laravel would look like if they were built for TypeScript from the ground up.
The first thing I noticed when using AdonisJS was how much it reduces decision fatigue. You don't pick between 5 ORM options. Lucid is right there. You don't debate validation libraries. The built-in validator handles it. You don't wonder about folder structure. The framework defines it for you.
For solo developers, this matters more than most people realize. Every decision you don't have to make is time saved and cognitive load reduced. AdonisJS makes sensible choices so you can focus on your actual product.
Key Differences
Batteries included vs. bring your own everything. AdonisJS ships with an ORM, migrations, authentication, validation, mailers, and more. Next.js API Routes ship with a request and response object. The gap in built-in functionality is massive.
Database story. AdonisJS has Lucid ORM with a migration system that handles schema changes cleanly. With Next.js API Routes, you'll typically add Prisma or Drizzle, configure it, set up migrations separately, and manage the database connection yourself. AdonisJS handles all of this out of the box.
Validation. AdonisJS has a schema-based validator built in. You define rules, and invalid requests are rejected before reaching your handler. API Routes have no validation. You either add Zod manually to every endpoint or hope for the best.
Auth system. AdonisJS includes session-based and token-based authentication with guards, middleware, and user providers. With Next.js, you'll use NextAuth or a third-party service. Both work, but AdonisJS auth integrates more tightly with the rest of the framework.
TypeScript experience. Both are TypeScript-first. AdonisJS v6 was rewritten from scratch with TypeScript and the type inference throughout the framework is solid. Next.js API Routes use TypeScript but without framework-level type integration.
Community size. Next.js has a much larger community. AdonisJS has a smaller but dedicated following. You'll find more Stack Overflow answers for Next.js issues, but AdonisJS documentation is excellent and usually sufficient.
When to Choose Next.js API Routes
- Your app is frontend-heavy and the backend is an afterthought
- You have fewer than 10 endpoints
- You want everything in one Next.js project
- You're deploying to Vercel and want zero-config
- Speed to first deploy matters most
When to Choose AdonisJS
- You need a real backend with ORM, auth, validation, and structure
- You want a Laravel-like experience in TypeScript
- Your app has complex business logic, background jobs, or scheduled tasks
- You prefer convention over configuration
- You're building something that will grow over time
The Verdict
If I'm building a backend-heavy application as a solo developer in the Node.js/TypeScript ecosystem, AdonisJS is genuinely one of the best options. It fills the gap that NestJS tries to fill but with less boilerplate and more developer-friendly conventions. Think of it as "what if Laravel was TypeScript."
Next.js API Routes are great for what they are. But they're not a backend framework. They're an escape hatch for server-side logic in a frontend framework.
If your backend needs are simple, stay with API Routes. If you're building something with users, roles, database relationships, email notifications, and background processing, AdonisJS will save you weeks of assembling libraries and wiring them together. That's the kind of time saving that actually changes whether a solo project ships or dies in development.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.