Redis vs Neon for Solo Developers
Comparing Redis and Neon for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Redis | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| Type | In-memory data store and cache | Serverless PostgreSQL |
| Pricing | Free / Open Source / Cloud from $5/mo | Free tier / $19/mo Pro |
| Learning Curve | Easy | Easy |
| Best For | Caching, sessions, queues, real-time features | Serverless PostgreSQL for side projects and startups |
| Solo Dev Rating | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Redis Overview
Redis operates as the fast layer in your application stack. Sub-millisecond reads and writes for cached data, session tokens, rate limit counters, job queues, and real-time pub/sub messaging. It stores everything in memory, which means it's blazing fast but limited by available RAM.
The practical value of Redis shows up the moment your application gets real traffic. Database queries that take 20-50ms from PostgreSQL take 0.5ms from Redis cache. Multiply that across hundreds of requests per second, and Redis turns a sluggish application into a responsive one. I add Redis to every production stack because the performance gain is too significant to ignore.
Redis is free to self-host, and managed options start at $5/month. Upstash offers a serverless Redis with a generous free tier that pairs well with serverless applications. The ecosystem is mature, well-documented, and supported by every major programming language.
Neon Overview
Neon is serverless PostgreSQL done right. Your database scales to zero when idle and resumes in milliseconds when a query arrives. You get full PostgreSQL compatibility, database branching for safe schema testing, and autoscaling that adjusts compute based on load. No database server to manage, no idle costs eating your budget.
The free tier is excellent for solo developers. 0.5GB storage, 190 compute hours per month, and branching support. For side projects and low-traffic applications, you might never need to upgrade. The database suspends after inactivity and cold-starts fast enough that users rarely notice.
Database branching is Neon's killer feature. Create a branch of your production data, test migrations against it, verify everything works, then deploy with confidence. No more guessing whether a migration will break production. For solo developers who can't afford downtime, this safety net is invaluable.
Key Differences
Different layers of the stack. Neon is a primary database for persistent relational data. Redis is a supplementary data store for caching, sessions, and real-time features. They solve different problems and work best when used together rather than as alternatives.
Data model. Neon gives you full PostgreSQL. Tables, relationships, joins, constraints, triggers, extensions. Your application's core data lives here. Redis gives you data structures: strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, and streams. Temporary, fast-access data lives here.
Persistence guarantees. Neon stores your data durably with replication and point-in-time recovery. Redis stores data in memory. Redis has persistence options (RDB snapshots, AOF logs), but it's fundamentally designed for data that can be regenerated if lost. Your user profiles go in Neon. Your cached API responses go in Redis.
Query capabilities. Neon gives you the full power of PostgreSQL SQL. Complex joins, CTEs, window functions, full-text search, JSONB queries, and the entire extension ecosystem (PostGIS, pg_trgm, and hundreds more). Redis supports key lookups and data structure operations. For analytical queries, reporting, and complex data retrieval, Neon is the tool.
Serverless behavior. Both scale well in serverless environments. Neon scales to zero and resumes on demand. Upstash Redis offers per-request pricing for serverless. Both avoid the problem of paying for idle capacity, which matters for solo developers running multiple side projects.
Cost. Neon's free tier covers the primary database needs of most side projects. Redis is free to self-host, and Upstash's free tier covers basic caching needs. Together, you can run a complete application stack for $0 until you have real traffic.
When to Choose Redis
- Your application already has a primary database and needs a caching layer
- Session management, rate limiting, or background job queues are requirements
- You need real-time pub/sub for WebSocket broadcasting or event-driven features
- Sub-millisecond data access is critical for specific hot paths
- You want to reduce load on your primary database during traffic spikes
When to Choose Neon
- You need a primary relational database for your application data
- PostgreSQL features (joins, constraints, extensions) are requirements
- Serverless scaling and scale-to-zero matter for your budget
- Database branching for safe migration testing is important
- You want managed PostgreSQL without the cost of running your own server
The Verdict
Use both. That's the honest answer.
Neon handles your primary data storage. User accounts, products, orders, content, everything that needs to be persistent, queryable, and relational. Neon's serverless PostgreSQL with branching is an excellent foundation for any application.
Redis handles your performance layer. Cache the most frequent Neon queries, store user sessions, manage rate limits, run background job queues, and power real-time features through pub/sub.
If you can only start with one, start with Neon. You need a primary database before you need a cache. Every application needs persistent data storage. Not every application needs sub-millisecond caching on day one.
Add Redis when your application grows enough that database query performance becomes a bottleneck, or when you need specific capabilities like job queues, rate limiting, or real-time pub/sub. At that point, Redis paired with Neon gives you a production-grade data layer that handles everything from persistent storage to microsecond-fast cache reads.
For solo developers: Neon free tier plus Upstash Redis free tier gives you a complete data stack for zero dollars. That's a strong starting point for any project.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.