Vue vs Solid for Solo Developers
Comparing Vue and Solid for solo developers.
Vue vs Solid for Solo Developers
Vue and SolidJS both position themselves as approachable alternatives to React, but they take different paths to get there. Vue uses a template-based syntax with a reactivity system powered by JavaScript proxies. Solid uses JSX with fine-grained reactivity where signals drive precise DOM updates. Both prioritize developer experience, but the trade-offs matter when you are building alone.
Vue Overview
Vue is a progressive JavaScript framework created by Evan You. With Vue 3 and the Composition API, it combines the familiarity of HTML templates with a powerful reactivity system. Vue's single-file components (.vue files) keep your template, script, and styles together in one file, which makes it easy to reason about individual components.
For solo developers, Vue strikes a balance between power and simplicity. The template syntax is intuitive if you know HTML. The Composition API gives you the flexibility of hooks-style logic composition without the re-rendering gotchas of React. Vue's official ecosystem (Vue Router, Pinia for state management, Nuxt for SSR) is cohesive and well-documented.
Vue has a strong community, especially in Asia and Europe. The ecosystem is smaller than React's but significantly larger than Solid's. You will find component libraries (Vuetify, PrimeVue, Naive UI), utilities, and tutorials to cover most common needs.
Solid Overview
SolidJS uses JSX like React but with a fundamentally different execution model. Components in Solid run once and never re-execute. Reactivity is handled through signals, and only the specific DOM nodes bound to changed signals update. There is no virtual DOM diffing and no re-rendering of component trees.
For solo developers, Solid offers a clean mental model. You create signals, derive values with memos, and handle side effects with createEffect. Because there is no re-rendering, you never need to think about memoization, stale closures, or dependency arrays. The code you write is the code that runs.
Solid's weakness is its ecosystem. It has far fewer third-party libraries, component kits, and community resources than Vue. While the community is enthusiastic and the core team is responsive, you will encounter situations where you need to build something from scratch that Vue would give you out of the box.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Vue | Solid |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Curve | Low-Moderate | Moderate (signals model) |
| Syntax | Templates (HTML-like) | JSX |
| Reactivity | Proxy-based (automatic) | Signal-based (fine-grained) |
| Performance | Very good | Excellent (top benchmarks) |
| Bundle Size | ~33KB minified | ~7KB minified |
| Component Model | Single-file components | JSX components |
| Ecosystem | Large, cohesive | Small, growing |
| State Management | Pinia (official) | Built-in signals |
| TypeScript | Good | Excellent |
| Meta-framework | Nuxt | SolidStart |
| Community | Large (global) | Small, active |
| Maturity | 10+ years | ~3 years |
When to Pick Vue
Choose Vue when you want a mature framework with a well-integrated ecosystem and do not want to piece together your own stack. Vue's official router, state management, and meta-framework (Nuxt) are designed to work together seamlessly. This coherence saves time for solo developers who do not want to evaluate and integrate multiple independent libraries.
Vue is also a strong pick if you prefer template syntax over JSX. Vue templates read like enhanced HTML, which many developers find more intuitive. The single-file component format keeps concerns co-located without requiring you to write everything in JavaScript.
If your project needs a solid component library ecosystem (form builders, data tables, UI kits), Vue has more options than Solid. Libraries like Vuetify and PrimeVue are mature and feature-rich.
When to Pick Solid
Choose SolidJS when performance is a top priority and you want the smallest possible runtime overhead. Solid consistently ranks at the top of JavaScript framework benchmarks. If you are building a data-heavy dashboard, interactive tool, or any application where rendering speed directly affects the user experience, Solid gives you a structural advantage.
Solid also appeals to developers who like JSX and React's component model but dislike the complexity of React's re-rendering behavior. If you have been frustrated by unnecessary re-renders, stale closures, or memoization boilerplate, Solid eliminates those issues entirely.
For solo developers starting a new project with minimal third-party library requirements, Solid's simplicity and performance make it a compelling choice. You write less code, reason about it more easily, and ship faster bundles.
Verdict
Vue is the more practical choice for solo developers who want a complete, batteries-included framework with a large ecosystem and proven track record. Its balance of simplicity, power, and community support makes it a reliable foundation for most web projects.
SolidJS is the right pick for solo developers who prioritize performance, prefer JSX, and are comfortable with a smaller ecosystem. It offers a cleaner reactive model and smaller bundles, but requires more self-sufficiency when it comes to tooling and third-party components.
For a general-purpose solo project, Vue gets you farther faster. For a performance-focused project where you are comfortable building more yourself, Solid is an excellent choice.
Related Articles
Angular vs HTMX for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and HTMX for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs Qwik for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and Qwik for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.
Angular vs SolidJS for Solo Developers
Comparing Angular and SolidJS for solo developers. Features, pricing, pros and cons, and which one to pick for your next project.